Intel Arc 140T Mobile vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Arc 140T Mobile and 0System Shared VRAM Iris Pro Graphics 5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc 140T Mobile 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 104% (2350MHz vs 1150MHz)
704 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 45W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc 140T Mobile
+553%
4.813 TFLOPS
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
0.736 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2025
Release Date
Jun 2013
Arc Graphics-M
Generation
HD Graphics
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
200 MHz
2350 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
320
64
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
4
128
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
75.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.600 GPixel/s
150.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.00 GTexel/s
9.626 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.813 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
736.0 GFLOPS
1203 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
184.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
45W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Arrow Lake
GPU Name
Haswell GT3e
-
-
-
Xe2-LPG
Architecture
Generation 7.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
3 nm
Process Size
22 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.0
-
-
-
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
