Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A310 vs NVIDIA A16 PCIe

Intel Arc A310 vs NVIDIA A16 PCIe

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A310 and 16GB VRAM A16 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 3% (1750MHz vs 1695MHz)
Lower TDP (30W vs 250W)
NVIDIA A16 PCIe 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (231.9GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A310
2.688 TFLOPS
A16 PCIe +61%
4.339 TFLOPS
Blender
Arc A310
475
A16 PCIe +7%
510
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2022
Release Date
Apr 2021
Alchemist
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1750 MHz
Base Clock
885 MHz
1750 MHz
Boost Clock
1695 MHz
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
1812 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
124.0GB/s
Bandwidth
231.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
10
768
Shading Units
1280
32
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
32
96
Tensor Cores
40
6
RT Cores
10
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.24 GPixel/s
56.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.80 GTexel/s
5.376 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.339 TFLOPS
2.688 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.339 TFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
135.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
GA107
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
6 nm
Process Size
8 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
Unknown
157 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy