Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A310 vs NVIDIA CMP 30HX

Intel Arc A310 vs NVIDIA CMP 30HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A310 and 6GB VRAM CMP 30HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Lower TDP (30W vs 125W)
NVIDIA CMP 30HX 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 2% (1785MHz vs 1750MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A310
2.688 TFLOPS
CMP 30HX +87%
5.027 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2022
Release Date
Feb 2021
Alchemist
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

1750 MHz
Base Clock
1530 MHz
1750 MHz
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
192bit
124.0GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
22
-
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
1408
32
TMUs
88
16
ROPs
48
96
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB

Theoretical Performance

28.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
85.68 GPixel/s
56.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
157.1 GTexel/s
5.376 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.05 TFLOPS
2.688 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.027 TFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
157.1 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
TU116
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
TU116-100-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
12 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Board Design

30W
TDP
125W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy