Intel Arc A310 vs ATI FireGL V3600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A310 and 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1750MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
648 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 73W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A310
+1766%
2.688 TFLOPS
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2022
Release Date
Jun 2007
Alchemist
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1750 MHz
Base Clock
-
1750 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
124.0GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
120
32
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
96
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
28.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
56.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
5.376 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.688 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
30W
TDP
73W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
RV630
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
RV630 GL
Generation 12.7
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
65 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
