Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A310 vs AMD FirePro S9150

Intel Arc A310 vs AMD FirePro S9150

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A310 and 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1750MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 235W)
AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A310
2.688 TFLOPS
FirePro S9150 +88%
5.069 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2022
Release Date
Aug 2014
Alchemist
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1750 MHz
Base Clock
-
1750 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
512bit
124.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
2816
32
TMUs
176
16
ROPs
64
96
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
56.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
158.4 GTexel/s
5.376 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.688 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.069 TFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.534 TFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
235W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
Hawaii
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy