Intel Arc A310 vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A310 and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1750MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 300W)
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A310
2.688 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2
+197%
7.987 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2022
Release Date
Mar 2016
Alchemist
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1750 MHz
Base Clock
-
1750 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
124.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
4096
32
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
64
96
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
28.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
56.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
5.376 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.688 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
30W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
Capsaicin
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.0
