Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A310 vs AMD FirePro W600

Intel Arc A310 vs AMD FirePro W600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A310 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1750MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A310 +250%
2.688 TFLOPS
FirePro W600
0.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2022
Release Date
Jun 2012
Alchemist
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1750 MHz
Base Clock
-
1750 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
124.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
512
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
96
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
56.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
5.376 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.688 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
48.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
Cape Verde
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy