Intel Arc A310 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A310 and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1750MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
736 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 50W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A310
+2886%
2.688 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition
0.09 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2022
Release Date
Jan 2009
Alchemist
Generation
GeForce 100
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1750 MHz
Base Clock
-
1750 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
124.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
768
Shading Units
32
32
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
8
96
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
28.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
56.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.800 GTexel/s
5.376 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.688 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
89.60 GFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
30W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI
1x mini-DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
G96C
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
55 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
121 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
