Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A310 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM

Intel Arc A310 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A310 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 320 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1750MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
696 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 43W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A310 +1329%
2.688 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 320 OEM
0.188 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2022
Release Date
Feb 2010
Alchemist
Generation
GeForce 300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1750 MHz
Base Clock
-
1750 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
124.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
9
768
Shading Units
72
32
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
96
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.320 GPixel/s
56.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.96 GTexel/s
5.376 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.688 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
187.5 GFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

30W
TDP
43W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
GT215
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
GT215-250-A2
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy