Intel Arc A310 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 PCI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A310 and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 430 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Released 12 years late
Boost Clock1750MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
672 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 49W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A310
+899%
2.688 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 430 PCI
0.269 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2022
Release Date
Oct 2010
Alchemist
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1750 MHz
Base Clock
-
1750 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
124.0GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
768
Shading Units
96
32
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
4
96
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
28.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.800 GPixel/s
56.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.20 GTexel/s
5.376 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.688 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
268.8 GFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.40 GFLOPS
Board Design
30W
TDP
49W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
GF108
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
GF108-300-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
