Intel Arc A310 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A310 and 288GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI325X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 1000W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 20% (2100MHz vs 1750MHz)
More VRAM (288GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
18688 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A310
2.688 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI325X
+2940%
81.72 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2022
Release Date
Oct 2024
Alchemist
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1750 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1750 MHz
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
2525 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
288GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM3e
64bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
124.0GB/s
Bandwidth
10.3TB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
304
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
19456
32
TMUs
1216
16
ROPs
0
96
Tensor Cores
1216
6
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
L3 Cache
256 MB
Theoretical Performance
28.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
56.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2553.6 GTexel/s
5.376 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
653.7 TFLOPS
2.688 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
81.72 TFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.72 TFLOPS
Board Design
30W
TDP
1000W
200 W
Suggested PSU
1400 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
5 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
153 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
N/A
