Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A310 vs AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM

Intel Arc A310 vs AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A310 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 67% (1750MHz vs 1050MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A310 +233%
2.688 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250 OEM
0.806 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2022
Release Date
Oct 2013
Alchemist
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1750 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1750 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
124.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
384
32
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
96
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.400 GPixel/s
56.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.20 GTexel/s
5.376 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.688 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
806.4 GFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
50.40 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
65W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
Oland
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
Oland XT (215-0837000)
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy