Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A310 vs AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT

Intel Arc A310 vs AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A310 and 20GB VRAM Radeon RX 7950 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 71% (3000MHz vs 1750MHz)
More VRAM (20GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (800.0GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
4608 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A310
2.688 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 7950 XT +2299%
64.51 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2022
Release Date
Unknown
Alchemist
Generation
Navi III
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1750 MHz
Base Clock
2000 MHz
1750 MHz
Boost Clock
3000 MHz
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
320bit
124.0GB/s
Bandwidth
800.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
84
768
Shading Units
5376
32
TMUs
336
16
ROPs
192
96
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
84
-
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
4 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

28.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
576.0 GPixel/s
56.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1008 GTexel/s
5.376 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
129.0 TFLOPS
2.688 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
64.51 TFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.016 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
Navi 31
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
Navi 31 XT+
Generation 12.7
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
5 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Board Design

30W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a 2x DisplayPort 2.1 1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy