Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A310 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano

Intel Arc A310 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A310 and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 13% (1750MHz vs 1546MHz)
Lower TDP (30W vs 175W)
AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (409.6GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A310
2.688 TFLOPS
Radeon RX Vega Nano +370%
12.66 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2022
Release Date
Unknown
Alchemist
Generation
Vega
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1750 MHz
Base Clock
1247 MHz
1750 MHz
Boost Clock
1546 MHz
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2
64bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
124.0GB/s
Bandwidth
409.6GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
64
768
Shading Units
4096
32
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
64
96
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

28.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.94 GPixel/s
56.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
395.8 GTexel/s
5.376 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.688 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.66 TFLOPS
672.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
791.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
Vega 10
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
6 nm
Process Size
14 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Board Design

30W
TDP
175W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy