Intel Arc A310 vs NVIDIA TITAN RTX

VS

Intel Arc A310

NVIDIA TITAN RTX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A310 and 24GB VRAM TITAN RTX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A310 's Advantages

Released 3 years and 10 months late

Lower TDP (30W vs 280W)

NVIDIA TITAN RTX 's Advantages

Boost Clock has increased by 1% (1770MHz vs 1750MHz)

More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)

3840 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Arc A310

2.688 TFLOPS

TITAN RTX +506%

16.31 TFLOPS

Blender

Arc A310

475

TITAN RTX +531%

2999

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p

Arc A310

7

TITAN RTX +871%

68

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p

Arc A310

20

TITAN RTX +520%

124

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p

Arc A310

30

TITAN RTX +473%

172

Arc A310

VS

TITAN RTX

Graphics Card

Oct 2022

Release Date

Dec 2018

Alchemist

Generation

GeForce 20

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 4.0 x8

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1750 MHz

Base Clock

1350 MHz

1750 MHz

Boost Clock

1770 MHz

1937 MHz

Memory Clock

1750 MHz

Memory

4GB

Memory Size

24GB

GDDR6

Memory Type

GDDR6

64bit

Memory Bus

384bit

124.0GB/s

Bandwidth

672.0GB/s

Render Config

-

SM Count

72

768

Shading Units

4608

32

TMUs

288

16

ROPs

96

Tensor Cores

576

6

RT Cores

72

-

L1 Cache

64 KB (per SM)

4 MB

L2 Cache

6 MB

-

Theoretical Performance

28.00 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

169.9 GPixel/s

56.00 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

509.8 GTexel/s

5.376 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

32.62 TFLOPS

2.688 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

16.31 TFLOPS

672.0 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

509.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W

TDP

280W

200 W

Suggested PSU

600 W

4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0

Outputs

1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C

None

Power Connectors

2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

DG2-128

GPU Name

TU102

ACM-G11

GPU Variant

TU102-400-A1

Generation 12.7

Architecture

Turing

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

6 nm

Process Size

12 nm

7.2 billion

Transistors

18.6 billion

157 mm²

Die Size

754 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

-

CUDA

7.5

6.6

Shader Model

6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

1

Intel Arc A310 vs ATI FirePro V7770

2

Intel Arc A310 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6

3

Intel Arc A310 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER

4

Intel Arc A310 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 540

5

Intel Arc A310 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2

6

Intel Arc A310 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GS Rev. 2

7

Intel Arc A310 vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 PRO

8

Intel Arc A310 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB

9

Intel Arc A310 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 555 OEM

10

Intel Arc A310 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150 OEM

Related News

1

AMD Unveils New RX 9070 XT Graphics Card Performance: Positioned Between RX 7900 GRE and RX 7900 XT

2

Double the Excitement! AMD FSR 4.0 to Launch Alongside RX 9070 XT Graphics Card

3

CPU-Z Minor Update: Support for Intel's Four New Products and New Memory

4

CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production

5

Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N

6

The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market

7

NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps

8

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim

9

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

10

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes