Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A350 vs ATI FireGL V8650

Intel Arc A350 vs ATI FireGL V8650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A350 and 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A350 +598%
3.072 TFLOPS
FireGL V8650
0.44 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Aug 2007
Alchemist
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR4
64bit
Memory Bus
512bit
124.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
4
768
Shading Units
320
48
TMUs
16
24
ROPs
16
96
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

48.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
96.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
6.144 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.072 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
768.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
R600
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
R600 V8650 (215RGIDKA13FG)
Generation 12.7
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
80 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Board Design

25W
TDP
Unknown
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy