Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A350 vs ATI FirePro V4800

Intel Arc A350 vs ATI FirePro V4800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A350 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
368 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 69W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A350 +395%
3.072 TFLOPS
FirePro V4800
0.62 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Apr 2010
Alchemist
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
124.0GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
5
768
Shading Units
400
48
TMUs
20
24
ROPs
8
96
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

48.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.200 GPixel/s
96.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.50 GTexel/s
6.144 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.072 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
620.0 GFLOPS
768.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
Redwood
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
Redwood XT GL
Generation 12.7
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Board Design

25W
TDP
69W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy