Intel Arc A350 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A350 and 128MB VRAM GeForce 8600 GT Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 24.00GB/s)
736 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 47W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A350
+3203%
3.072 TFLOPS
GeForce 8600 GT Mac Edition
0.093 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Apr 2007
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
124.0GB/s
Bandwidth
24.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
768
Shading Units
32
48
TMUs
16
24
ROPs
8
96
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
48.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
96.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
9.600 GTexel/s
6.144 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.072 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
92.80 GFLOPS
768.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
25W
TDP
47W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
G84
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
G84-303-A2
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
80 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
