Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

Intel Arc A350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A350 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 20% (2000MHz vs 1665MHz)
Lower TDP (25W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A350 +2%
3.072 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650
2.984 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Apr 2019
Alchemist
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
1485 MHz
2000 MHz
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
124.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
896
48
TMUs
56
24
ROPs
32
96
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

48.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
53.28 GPixel/s
96.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.24 GTexel/s
6.144 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.967 TFLOPS
3.072 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.984 TFLOPS
768.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
93.24 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
TU117
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
TU117-300-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
12 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Board Design

25W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy