Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A350 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6900X

Intel Arc A350 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6900X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A350 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6900X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Pro W6900X 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 8% (2150MHz vs 2000MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
4352 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A350
3.072 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6900X +616%
22.02 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Aug 2021
Alchemist
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
1825 MHz
2000 MHz
Boost Clock
2150 MHz
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
124.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
80
768
Shading Units
5120
48
TMUs
320
24
ROPs
128
96
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
80
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
4 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

48.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
275.2 GPixel/s
96.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
688.0 GTexel/s
6.144 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
44.03 TFLOPS
3.072 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.02 TFLOPS
768.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1376 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
Navi 21
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
Navi 21 Pro-XTA
Generation 12.7
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
7 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Board Design

25W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy