Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A350M vs AMD FirePro M3900

Intel Arc A350M vs AMD FirePro M3900

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A350M and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A350M 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1150MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
608 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 25W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A350M +635%
1.766 TFLOPS
FirePro M3900
0.24 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Oct 2010
Alchemist
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

300 MHz
Base Clock
-
1150 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
160
48
TMUs
8
24
ROPs
4
-
-
-
6
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

27.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.000 GPixel/s
55.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.000 GTexel/s
3.533 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.766 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
441.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

25W
TDP
20W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
Seymour
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
Seymour GL
Generation 12.7
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.37 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy