Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A350M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q

Intel Arc A350M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A350M and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A350M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 16% (1335MHz vs 1150MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A350M
1.766 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q +132%
4.101 TFLOPS
Blender
Arc A350M
392
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q +66%
653
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Apr 2019
Alchemist
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

300 MHz
Base Clock
1140 MHz
1150 MHz
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
192bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
24
768
Shading Units
1536
48
TMUs
96
24
ROPs
48
-
-
-
6
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

27.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.08 GPixel/s
55.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.2 GTexel/s
3.533 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.202 TFLOPS
1.766 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.101 TFLOPS
441.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
128.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
TU116
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
12 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy