Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A350M vs NVIDIA NVS 2100M

Intel Arc A350M vs NVIDIA NVS 2100M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A350M and 512MB VRAM NVS 2100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A350M 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1150MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
752 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 2100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (11W vs 25W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A350M +4428%
1.766 TFLOPS
NVS 2100M
0.039 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Jan 2010
Alchemist
Generation
NVS Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

300 MHz
Base Clock
-
1150 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
16
48
TMUs
8
24
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
6
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

27.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.140 GPixel/s
55.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.280 GTexel/s
3.533 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.766 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
441.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
GT218
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Board Design

25W
TDP
11W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy