Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A350M vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64

Intel Arc A350M vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A350M and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega 64 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A350M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
Lower TDP (25W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 17% (1350MHz vs 1150MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (402.4GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A350M
1.766 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Vega 64 +526%
11.06 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Jun 2017
Alchemist
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

300 MHz
Base Clock
1250 MHz
1150 MHz
Boost Clock
1350 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
786 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2
64bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
402.4GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
4096
48
TMUs
256
24
ROPs
64
-
-
-
6
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

27.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
55.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
345.6 GTexel/s
3.533 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
22.12 TFLOPS
1.766 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.06 TFLOPS
441.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
691.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
250W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
Vega 10
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
6 nm
Process Size
14 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy