Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A370M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation

Intel Arc A370M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc A370M and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A370M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 50W)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 30% (2010MHz vs 1550MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A370M
3.174 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation +289%
12.35 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
Mar 2023
Alchemist
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

300 MHz
Base Clock
1530 MHz
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
2010 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
24
1024
Shading Units
3072
64
TMUs
96
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
8
RT Cores
24
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

49.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.48 GPixel/s
99.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
193.0 GTexel/s
6.349 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.35 TFLOPS
3.174 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.35 TFLOPS
793.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
193.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
AD107
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
5 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.6
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy