Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A380 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI

Intel Arc A380 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc A380 and 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A380 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 75W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2022
Release Date
Jan 2008
Alchemist
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR
96bit
Memory Bus
128bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
-
64
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
128
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

65.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
131.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
8.397 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.198 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
RV380
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Rage 9
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
130 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
92 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
20W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy