Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A380 vs AMD FirePro S9100

Intel Arc A380 vs AMD FirePro S9100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc A380 and 12GB VRAM FirePro S9100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A380 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)
AMD FirePro S9100 's Advantages
More VRAM (12GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 186.0GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A380
4.198 TFLOPS
FirePro S9100
4.219 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2022
Release Date
Oct 2014
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
96bit
Memory Bus
512bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
40
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
2560
64
TMUs
160
32
ROPs
64
128
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

65.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.74 GPixel/s
131.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
131.8 GTexel/s
8.397 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.198 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.219 TFLOPS
1050 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.109 TFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
Hawaii
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL40
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy