Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A380 vs AMD FirePro V5900

Intel Arc A380 vs AMD FirePro V5900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc A380 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V5900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A380 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A380 +583%
4.198 TFLOPS
FirePro V5900
0.614 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2022
Release Date
May 2011
Alchemist
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
96bit
Memory Bus
256bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
8
1024
Shading Units
512
64
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
32
128
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

65.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
131.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
8.397 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.198 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
614.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
153.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
Cayman
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
Cayman LE WS
Generation 12.7
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy