Intel Arc A380 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB

VS

Intel Arc A380 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc A380 and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A380 's Advantages

Lower TDP (75W vs 160W)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB 's Advantages

Released 11 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 24% (2535MHz vs 2050MHz)

More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 186.0GB/s)

3328 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Arc A380

4.198 TFLOPS

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB +425%

22.06 TFLOPS

3DMark Time Spy

Arc A380

4254

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB +217%

13509

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p

Arc A380

10

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB +480%

58

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p

Arc A380

28

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB +321%

118

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p

Arc A380

40

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB +405%

202

Arc A380

VS

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB

Graphics Card

Jun 2022

Release Date

May 2023

Alchemist

Generation

GeForce 40

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 4.0 x8

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz

Base Clock

2310 MHz

2050 MHz

Boost Clock

2535 MHz

1937 MHz

Memory Clock

2250 MHz

Memory

6GB

Memory Size

8GB

GDDR6

Memory Type

GDDR6

96bit

Memory Bus

128bit

186.0GB/s

Bandwidth

288.0GB/s

Render Config

-

SM Count

34

-

Compute Units

-

1024

Shading Units

4352

64

TMUs

136

32

ROPs

48

128

Tensor Cores

136

8

RT Cores

34

-

L1 Cache

128 KB (per SM)

4 MB

L2 Cache

32 MB

Theoretical Performance

65.60 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

121.7 GPixel/s

131.2 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

344.8 GTexel/s

8.397 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

22.06 TFLOPS

4.198 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

22.06 TFLOPS

-

FP64 (double)

344.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-128

GPU Name

AD106

ACM-G11

GPU Variant

AD106-350-A1

Generation 12.7

Architecture

Ada Lovelace

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

6 nm

Process Size

5 nm

7.2 billion

Transistors

22.9 billion

157 mm²

Die Size

190 mm²

Board Design

75W

TDP

160W

250 W

Suggested PSU

450 W

1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0

Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a

1x 8-pin

Power Connectors

1x 16-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

-

CUDA

8.9

6.6

Shader Model

6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs Intel Arc A380

2

Intel Arc A380 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB

3

Intel Arc A310 vs Intel Arc A380

4

Intel Arc A380 vs AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT

5

Intel Arc A380 vs ATI FireGL V7700

6

Intel Arc A380 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570

7

Intel Arc A380 vs Intel Arc A580

8

Intel Arc A380 vs AMD Radeon HD 6770

9

Intel Arc A380 vs ATI FirePro V7750

10

Intel Arc A380 vs NVIDIA NVS 315

Related News

1

Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience

2

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

3

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

4

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

5

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

6

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

7

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

8

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

9

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

10

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD