Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A380M vs AMD FirePro M3900

Intel Arc A380M vs AMD FirePro M3900

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc A380M and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A380M 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
864 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 35W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A380M +1606%
4.096 TFLOPS
FirePro M3900
0.24 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2023
Release Date
Oct 2010
Alchemist
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-A (3.1)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1550 MHz
Base Clock
-
2000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
64bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
160
64
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
128
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.000 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.000 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

35W
TDP
20W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
Seymour
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
Seymour GL
Generation 12.7
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.37 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy