Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A380M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile

Intel Arc A380M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc A380M and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A380M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 32% (2000MHz vs 1515MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (35W vs 50W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 186.0GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A380M +32%
4.096 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
3.103 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2023
Release Date
Apr 2020
Alchemist
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-A (3.1)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1550 MHz
Base Clock
1380 MHz
2000 MHz
Boost Clock
1515 MHz
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
96bit
Memory Bus
128bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
1024
64
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
128
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.48 GPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.96 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.205 TFLOPS
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.103 TFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
96.96 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
TU117
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
N18P-G61-MP2
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
12 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Board Design

35W
TDP
50W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy