Intel Arc A570M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX250
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Arc A570M and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A570M 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 25% (1300MHz vs 1038MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A570M
+568%
5.325 TFLOPS
GeForce MX250
0.797 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2023
Release Date
Unknown
Alchemist
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
937 MHz
1300 MHz
Boost Clock
1038 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
3
2048
Shading Units
384
128
TMUs
24
64
ROPs
16
256
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
83.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.61 GPixel/s
166.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.91 GTexel/s
10.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.46 GFLOPS
5.325 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
797.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
24.91 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
10W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-256
GPU Name
GP108B
ACM-G12
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
6 nm
Process Size
14 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.8 billion
Unknown
Die Size
74 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
6.6
Shader Model
6.4
