Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A750 vs ATI FirePro V8800

Intel Arc A750 vs ATI FirePro V8800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Arc A750 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A750 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
1984 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V8800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (208W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A750 +551%
17.2 TFLOPS
FirePro V8800
2.64 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2022
Release Date
Apr 2010
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2050 MHz
Base Clock
-
2400 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
3584
Shading Units
1600
224
TMUs
80
112
ROPs
32
448
Tensor Cores
-
28
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
16 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

268.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
537.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.00 GTexel/s
34.41 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
17.20 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.640 TFLOPS
2.150 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
528.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
208W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
Cypress
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
Generation 12.7
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy