Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A750 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI

Intel Arc A750 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Arc A750 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A750 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock2400MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
3568 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A750 +49042%
17.2 TFLOPS
GeForce 210 PCI
0.035 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2022
Release Date
Oct 2009
Alchemist
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

2050 MHz
Base Clock
-
2400 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
3584
Shading Units
16
224
TMUs
8
112
ROPs
4
448
Tensor Cores
-
28
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

268.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.900 GPixel/s
537.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.800 GTexel/s
34.41 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
17.20 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
35.20 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
GT216
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
31W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy