Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A750 vs NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM

Intel Arc A750 vs NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Arc A750 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 310 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A750 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 5.328GB/s)
3568 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A750 +38122%
17.2 TFLOPS
GeForce 310 OEM
0.045 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2022
Release Date
Nov 2009
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Generation
GeForce 300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2050 MHz
Base Clock
-
2400 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
333 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
5.328GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
3584
Shading Units
16
224
TMUs
8
112
ROPs
4
448
Tensor Cores
-
28
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

268.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
537.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
34.41 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
17.20 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.86 GFLOPS
2.150 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

225W
TDP
31W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
GT218
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
GT218-300-A2
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy