Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB

VS

Intel Arc A770 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arc A770 and 5GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A770 's Advantages

Released 4 years and 10 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 40% (2400MHz vs 1709MHz)

More VRAM (16GB vs 5GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 160.2GB/s)

2816 additional rendering cores

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB 's Advantages

Lower TDP (120W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Arc A770 +349%

19.66 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB

4.375 TFLOPS

3DMark Time Spy

Arc A770 +249%

13660

GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB

3909

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p

Arc A770 +181%

45

GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB

16

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p

Arc A770 +100%

80

GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB

40

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p

Arc A770 +110%

105

GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB

50

Arc A770

VS

GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB

Graphics Card

Oct 2022

Release Date

Dec 2017

Alchemist

Generation

GeForce 10

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 4.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2100 MHz

Base Clock

1506 MHz

2400 MHz

Boost Clock

1709 MHz

2000 MHz

Memory Clock

2002 MHz

Memory

16GB

Memory Size

5GB

GDDR6

Memory Type

GDDR5

256bit

Memory Bus

160bit

512.0GB/s

Bandwidth

160.2GB/s

Render Config

-

SM Count

10

-

Compute Units

-

4096

Shading Units

1280

256

TMUs

80

128

ROPs

40

512

Tensor Cores

-

32

RT Cores

-

L1 Cache

48 KB (per SM)

16 MB

L2 Cache

1280 KB

Theoretical Performance

307.2 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

68.36 GPixel/s

614.4 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

136.7 GTexel/s

39.32 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

68.36 GFLOPS

19.66 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

4.375 TFLOPS

-

FP64 (double)

136.7 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-512

GPU Name

GP106

ACM-G10

GPU Variant

GP106-350-K3-A1

Generation 12.7

Architecture

Pascal

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

6 nm

Process Size

16 nm

21.7 billion

Transistors

4.4 billion

406 mm²

Die Size

200 mm²

Board Design

225W

TDP

120W

550 W

Suggested PSU

300 W

1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0

Outputs

1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a

1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Power Connectors

1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

12 (12_1)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

-

CUDA

6.1

6.6

Shader Model

6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

1

Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

2

Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

3

Intel Arc A770 vs AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT

4

Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

5

Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

6

Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060

7

Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050

8

Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 610

9

Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210

10

Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 2

Related News

1

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

2

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

3

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

4

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

5

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

6

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

7

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

8

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD

9

NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance

10

Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports