Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB

VS

Intel Arc A770 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arc A770 and 12GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A770 's Advantages

Released 10 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 45% (2400MHz vs 1650MHz)

More VRAM (16GB vs 12GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 336.0GB/s)

1920 additional rendering cores

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB 's Advantages

Lower TDP (184W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Arc A770 +173%

19.66 TFLOPS

GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB

7.181 TFLOPS

3DMark Time Spy

Arc A770 +70%

13660

GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB

8020

Blender

Arc A770 +16%

2085

GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB

1791

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p

Arc A770 +50%

45

GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB

30

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p

Arc A770 +33%

80

GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB

60

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p

Arc A770 +15%

105

GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB

91

Arc A770

VS

GeForce RTX 2060 12 GB

Graphics Card

Oct 2022

Release Date

Dec 2021

Alchemist

Generation

GeForce 20

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 4.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2100 MHz

Base Clock

1470 MHz

2400 MHz

Boost Clock

1650 MHz

2000 MHz

Memory Clock

1750 MHz

Memory

16GB

Memory Size

12GB

GDDR6

Memory Type

GDDR6

256bit

Memory Bus

192bit

512.0GB/s

Bandwidth

336.0GB/s

Render Config

-

SM Count

34

-

Compute Units

-

4096

Shading Units

2176

256

TMUs

136

128

ROPs

48

512

Tensor Cores

272

32

RT Cores

34

-

L1 Cache

64 KB (per SM)

16 MB

L2 Cache

3 MB

Theoretical Performance

307.2 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

79.20 GPixel/s

614.4 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

224.4 GTexel/s

39.32 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

14.36 TFLOPS

19.66 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

7.181 TFLOPS

-

FP64 (double)

224.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-512

GPU Name

TU106

ACM-G10

GPU Variant

TU106-300-KA-A1

Generation 12.7

Architecture

Turing

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

6 nm

Process Size

12 nm

21.7 billion

Transistors

10.8 billion

406 mm²

Die Size

445 mm²

Board Design

225W

TDP

184W

550 W

Suggested PSU

450 W

1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0

Outputs

1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 2x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C

1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Power Connectors

1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

-

CUDA

7.5

6.6

Shader Model

6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

1

Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

2

Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

3

Intel Arc A770 vs AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT

4

Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

5

Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

6

Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060

7

Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050

8

Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+

9

Intel Arc A770 vs AMD Radeon R7 250X

10

Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 Rev. 2

Related News

1

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

2

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

3

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

4

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

5

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

6

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

7

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD

8

NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance

9

Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports

10

Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip