Intel Arc A770 vs AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

VS

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arc A770 and 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 6800 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A770 's Advantages

Released 2 years late

Boost Clock has increased by 7% (2400MHz vs 2250MHz)

Lower TDP (225W vs 300W)

AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT 's Advantages

512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Arc A770

19.66 TFLOPS

Radeon RX 6800 XT +5%

20.74 TFLOPS

3DMark Time Spy

Arc A770

13660

Radeon RX 6800 XT +42%

19428

Blender

Arc A770

2085

Radeon RX 6800 XT +26%

2647

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p

Arc A770

45

Radeon RX 6800 XT +60%

72

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p

Arc A770

80

Radeon RX 6800 XT +67%

134

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p

Arc A770

105

Radeon RX 6800 XT +79%

188

Horizon Forbidden West 1080p

Arc A770

49

Radeon RX 6800 XT +118%

107

Horizon Forbidden West 1440p

Arc A770

45

Radeon RX 6800 XT +15%

52

Arc A770

VS

Radeon RX 6800 XT

Graphics Card

Oct 2022

Release Date

Oct 2020

Alchemist

Generation

Navi II

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 4.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2100 MHz

Base Clock

1825 MHz

2400 MHz

Boost Clock

2250 MHz

2000 MHz

Memory Clock

2000 MHz

Memory

16GB

Memory Size

16GB

GDDR6

Memory Type

GDDR6

256bit

Memory Bus

256bit

512.0GB/s

Bandwidth

512.0GB/s

Render Config

-

SM Count

-

Compute Units

72

4096

Shading Units

4608

256

TMUs

288

128

ROPs

128

512

Tensor Cores

-

32

RT Cores

72

-

L1 Cache

128 KB per Array

16 MB

L2 Cache

4 MB

Theoretical Performance

307.2 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

288.0 GPixel/s

614.4 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

648.0 GTexel/s

39.32 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

41.47 TFLOPS

19.66 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

20.74 TFLOPS

-

FP64 (double)

1296 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-512

GPU Name

Navi 21

ACM-G10

GPU Variant

Navi 21 XT (215-121000177)

Generation 12.7

Architecture

RDNA 2.0

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

6 nm

Process Size

7 nm

21.7 billion

Transistors

26.8 billion

406 mm²

Die Size

520 mm²

Board Design

225W

TDP

300W

550 W

Suggested PSU

700 W

1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0

Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1 2x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C

1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Power Connectors

2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

2.1

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

-

CUDA

-

6.6

Shader Model

6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

1

Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

2

Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

3

Intel Arc A770 vs AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT

4

Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

5

Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070

6

Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060

7

Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050

8

Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM

9

Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 PCIe x1

10

Intel Arc A770 vs AMD FirePro S7000

Related News

1

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

2

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

3

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

4

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

5

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

6

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

7

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD

8

NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance

9

Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports

10

Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip