Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc A780 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB

Intel Arc A780 vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arc A780 and 6GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A780 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 132% (2200MHz vs 950MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (559.6GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (200W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc A780 +429%
18.02 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB
3.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Mar 2014
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2200 MHz
Base Clock
825 MHz
2200 MHz
Boost Clock
950 MHz
1093 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
559.6GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
1792
256
TMUs
112
128
ROPs
32
512
Tensor Cores
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
16 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

281.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
563.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
36.04 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
18.02 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
2.253 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

200W
TDP
375W
550 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
Tahiti
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
Orthrus
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy