Intel Arc A780 vs ATI FirePro V3800
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arc A780 and 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A780 's Advantages
Boost Clock2200MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (559.6GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
3696 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 200W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A780
+3365%
18.02 TFLOPS
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Apr 2010
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2200 MHz
Base Clock
-
2200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1093 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
559.6GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
400
256
TMUs
20
128
ROPs
8
512
Tensor Cores
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
16 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
281.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
563.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.00 GTexel/s
36.04 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
18.02 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
520.0 GFLOPS
2.253 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
200W
TDP
43W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.1
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
Redwood
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
Redwood PRO GL
Generation 12.7
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0
