Intel Arc A780 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arc A780 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A780 's Advantages
Boost Clock2200MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (559.6GB/s vs 512.0GB/s)
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Lower TDP (175W vs 200W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A780
+119%
18.02 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 Nano
8.192 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Aug 2015
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2200 MHz
Base Clock
-
2200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1093 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
HBM
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
559.6GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
4096
256
TMUs
256
128
ROPs
64
512
Tensor Cores
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
16 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
281.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
563.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
256.0 GTexel/s
36.04 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
18.02 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.192 TFLOPS
2.253 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
512.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
200W
TDP
175W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a
3x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
Fiji
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
Fiji XT CA
(215-0862120)
Generation 12.7
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.3
