Intel Arc A780 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arc A780 and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A780 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 3% (2200MHz vs 2130MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (559.6GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 200W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A780
+50%
18.02 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
12 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Feb 2024
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
2200 MHz
Base Clock
1620 MHz
2200 MHz
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
1093 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
559.6GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
22
4096
Shading Units
2816
256
TMUs
88
128
ROPs
48
512
Tensor Cores
88
32
RT Cores
22
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
281.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
563.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
36.04 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
18.02 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
2.253 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
200W
TDP
70W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
AD107
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
5 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.6
Shader Model
6.7
