Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc B580 vs AMD FireStream 9250

Intel Arc B580 vs AMD FireStream 9250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM Arc B580 and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc B580 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2670MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (456.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
1760 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 190W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc B580 +1267%
13.67 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2024
Release Date
Jun 2008
Battlemage(Arc 5)
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2670 MHz
Base Clock
-
2670 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2375 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
456.0GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
2560
Shading Units
800
160
TMUs
40
80
ROPs
16
160
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
256 KB (per EU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
18 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

213.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
427.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
27.34 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.67 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
1.709 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

190W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1a3x DisplayPort 2.1
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

BMG-G21
GPU Name
RV770
SRPMF
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
Xe2
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
19.6 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
272 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.4
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy