Intel Arc Graphics 64EU vs Intel Arc 140T Mobile
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Arc Graphics 64EU and 0System Shared VRAM Arc 140T Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc 140T Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 24% (2350MHz vs 1900MHz)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 65W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc Graphics 64EU
1.946 TFLOPS
Arc 140T Mobile
+147%
4.813 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2024
Release Date
Jan 2025
HD Graphics
Generation
Arc Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
1900 MHz
Boost Clock
2350 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
1024
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
RT Cores
8
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.20 GPixel/s
60.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.4 GTexel/s
3.891 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
9.626 TFLOPS
1.946 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.813 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1203 GFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
Motherboard Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Arrow Lake
GPU Name
Arrow Lake
-
-
-
Xe2-LPG
Architecture
Xe2-LPG
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
3 nm
Process Size
3 nm
17.8 billion
Transistors
Unknown
243 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.8
