Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc Pro A30M vs NVIDIA GeForce 800A

Intel Arc Pro A30M vs NVIDIA GeForce 800A

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Arc Pro A30M and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 800A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Pro A30M 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
976 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 800A 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 50W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A30M +4401%
4.096 TFLOPS
GeForce 800A
0.091 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Mar 2014
Alchemist
Generation
GeForce 800A
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
2000 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
1
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
48
64
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
950.0 MPixel/s
128.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.800 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.096 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.20 GFLOPS
1024 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.600 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
GF119
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
15W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy