Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc Pro A40 vs AMD FireStream 9270

Intel Arc Pro A40 vs AMD FireStream 9270

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A40 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Pro A40 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
224 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 160W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A40 +190%
3.482 TFLOPS
FireStream 9270
1.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Nov 2008
Alchemist
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
96bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
10
1024
Shading Units
800
64
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

54.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
108.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
6.963 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.482 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
870.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
RV770
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
RV770 XT
Generation 12.7
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
55 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Board Design

50W
TDP
160W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy