Intel Arc Pro A40 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A40 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc Pro A40 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
912 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 125W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A40
+936%
3.482 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition
0.336 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Feb 2008
Alchemist
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
1024
Shading Units
112
64
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
54.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
108.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.60 GTexel/s
6.963 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.482 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
336.0 GFLOPS
870.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
50W
TDP
125W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
G92
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
G92-270-A2
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
65 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
