Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc Pro A40 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM

Intel Arc Pro A40 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A40 and 1536MB VRAM GeForce GT 230 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Pro A40 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 24.00GB/s)
928 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A40 +1350%
3.482 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 230 OEM
0.24 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Apr 2009
Alchemist
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
96bit
Memory Bus
192bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
24.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
12
1024
Shading Units
96
64
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
12
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
48 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

54.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.000 GPixel/s
108.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
6.963 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.482 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
870.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
G92B
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
G92-159-B1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
55 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy