Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc Pro A40 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 240

Intel Arc Pro A40 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 240

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A40 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 240 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Pro A40 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 54.40GB/s)
928 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 69W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A40 +1254%
3.482 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 240
0.257 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Nov 2009
Alchemist
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
96bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
54.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
12
1024
Shading Units
96
64
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

54.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
108.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
6.963 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.482 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
257.3 GFLOPS
870.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

50W
TDP
69W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
GT215
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
GT215-450-A2
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy