Intel Arc Pro A40 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A40 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc Pro A40 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
784 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 204W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A40
+391%
3.482 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
0.708 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Jan 2009
Alchemist
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1242 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
512bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
159.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
30
1024
Shading Units
240
64
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
54.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.74 GPixel/s
108.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
6.963 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.482 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
708.5 GFLOPS
870.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
88.56 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
204W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
GT200B
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
G200-350-B3
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
55 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
